Michigan Medicine Collaborator Hub

Connecting university researchers with industry partners to advance medical innovation through expertise, project ideas, and resource sharing.

Role

UX Designer

Team

1 Project Manager

3 UX Designers

Tools

Figma

FigJam

Timeline

Sept - Dec 2024

OVERVIEW

The Fast Forward Medicine Innovation Business Development (FFMI-BD) team at the University of Michigan Medical School bridges the gap between university researchers and industry partners to advance medical innovation. Their mission is to turn groundbreaking research into impactful real-world solutions by:

Managing contracts, budgets, and negotiations.

Strengthening industry partnerships to facilitate research translation.


A key tool in this mission is the Collaborator Hub — a searchable database that enables industry partners to:

  • Connects industry partners with U-M investigators

  • Find faculty members with expertise that matches their needs

  • Explore faculty-proposed project ideas

-Access information on available lab and clinical resources


The FFMI-BD website can be found here.

The Collaborator Hub’s current dashboard’s nested scrolling, inconsistent layout, and accessibility issues hinder the tool’s usability and collaboration.

PROBLEM

💭

HMW (How might we)

Improve visual clarity, streamline navigation, and enhance accessibility for a more user-friendly collaboration experience?

RESEARCH & GOALS

Based on 10 user interviews and analyses, users pointed out the following the most:

Filtering and searching for university resources.

Users must first select a department, then choose between "Exclude" or "Keep Only" options before proceeding. If users want to explore multiple departments, they must individually remove each department "block" to refine their search, creating a cumbersome experience.

Nested scrolling.

Multiple layers of scrolling in the Collaborator Hub’s Tableau dashboard makes it difficult for users to navigate and view data without interruption.

Exporting information as CSV files.

Information (instructions and export options) display as pop-ups over integral formation. Moreover, we believed that a interface should be designed in which instructions to do a simple task should not be needed.

Based on our user interviews and research, we identified key pain points and goals to enhance usability of the Collaborator Hub:


  1. Simplify faculty descriptions

    • Replace technical jargon with clear, user-friendly language

    • Highlight faculty specializations to improve clarity and relevance

  2. Improve navigation

    • Implement static, clearly labeled buttons for a consistent navigation experience

    • Add a “Clear All Filters” option to provide users greater control

  3. Streamline filtering & sorting

    • Reorganize filters with a clear visual hierarchy to make them easier to use

    • Remove unnecessary options to reduce clutter and simplify decision-making

  4. Enhance layout & space

    • Prioritize key content to minimize excessive scrolling.

    • Organize information into subpages for better readability and focus.

    • Ensure instructions are visible, concise, and easy to follow.

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

Competitors demonstrate strengths in advanced search, profile features, and consistent design but often fall short in navigation efficiency and accessibility. Many platforms lack streamlined workflows and user-friendly customization, leaving opportunities to create a more intuitive and inclusive experience.

  • UI is clean and customizable

  • Top navigation bar is intuitive for users to switch from different tabs

  • Breadcrumb trails for indications to starting point to the end point

  • Gives options and flexibility with code issues and code request

  • Filters for topics, authors, and language

  • Text heavy (e.g. words on each system when filtering, not enough whitespace)

  • Profile overview for authors

  • Messaging system between researchers

  • Had to go through each page one by one

  • Good and consistent design, made it easy to understand/navigate

  • Data display with profiles

  • Misconception that you have to be in that field to access the resources – make it accessible to everyone

  • Advanced search and filtering options

  • Location and job type filters are logically grouped

  • Collaboration features are effective

  • Engagement-based elements promote professional networking

FINAL DESIGN

We used an iterative process — researching, designing, testing, getting feedback, and rinse and repeat.

Filtering and searching for university resources.

Users are able to easily search and filter through their preferences — whether it be

department, collaboration type, and more — through a dropdown.

Accessing information.

The Collaborator Hub spreadsheet can be easily filtered, sorted, and accessed. Nested scrolling has been removed for clarity and usability.

LEARNINGS

I started in this organization as a general member — someone who was brand new to Figma — and had the opportunity to grow through both personal and client projects. Through my experience with this client project, I’ve not only grown my passion for equitable educational resources and technologies, but also learned to work with stakeholders, clients, and a variety of team members who bring individual, unique perspectives to the design process.


What drew me originally to UX was the research and learning that comes with it — listening to stories, choices, adversities, experiences. I want to strive on in my professional career and personal life with this passion in mind with each step I take.

Michigan Medicine Collaborator Hub

Connecting university researchers with industry partners to advance medical innovation through expertise, project ideas, and resource sharing.

Role

UX Designer

Team

1 Project Manager

3 UX Designers

Tools

Figma

FigJam

Timeline

Sept - Dec 2024

OVERVIEW

The Fast Forward Medicine Innovation Business Development (FFMI-BD) team at the University of Michigan Medical School bridges the gap between university researchers and industry partners to advance medical innovation. Their mission is to turn groundbreaking research into impactful real-world solutions by:

Managing contracts, budgets, and negotiations.

Strengthening industry partnerships to facilitate research translation.


A key tool in this mission is the Collaborator Hub — a searchable database that enables industry partners to:

  • Connects industry partners with U-M investigators

  • Find faculty members with expertise that matches their needs

  • Explore faculty-proposed project ideas

-Access information on available lab and clinical resources


The FFMI-BD website can be found here.

The Collaborator Hub’s current dashboard’s nested scrolling, inconsistent layout, and accessibility issues hinder the tool’s usability and collaboration.

PROBLEM

💭

HMW (How might we)

Improve visual clarity, streamline navigation, and enhance accessibility for a more user-friendly collaboration experience?

RESEARCH & GOALS

Based on 10 user interviews and analyses, users pointed out the following the most:

Filtering and searching for university resources.

Users must first select a department, then choose between "Exclude" or "Keep Only" options before proceeding. If users want to explore multiple departments, they must individually remove each department "block" to refine their search, creating a cumbersome experience.

Nested scrolling.

Multiple layers of scrolling in the Collaborator Hub’s Tableau dashboard makes it difficult for users to navigate and view data without interruption.

Exporting information as CSV files.

Information (instructions and export options) display as pop-ups over integral formation. Moreover, we believed that a interface should be designed in which instructions to do a simple task should not be needed.

Based on our user interviews and research, we identified key pain points and goals to enhance usability of the Collaborator Hub:


  1. Simplify faculty descriptions

    • Replace technical jargon with clear, user-friendly language

    • Highlight faculty specializations to improve clarity and relevance

  2. Improve navigation

    • Implement static, clearly labeled buttons for a consistent navigation experience

    • Add a “Clear All Filters” option to provide users greater control

  3. Streamline filtering & sorting

    • Reorganize filters with a clear visual hierarchy to make them easier to use

    • Remove unnecessary options to reduce clutter and simplify decision-making

  4. Enhance layout & space

    • Prioritize key content to minimize excessive scrolling.

    • Organize information into subpages for better readability and focus.

    • Ensure instructions are visible, concise, and easy to follow.

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

Competitors demonstrate strengths in advanced search, profile features, and consistent design but often fall short in navigation efficiency and accessibility. Many platforms lack streamlined workflows and user-friendly customization, leaving opportunities to create a more intuitive and inclusive experience.

  • UI is clean and customizable

  • Top navigation bar is intuitive for users to switch from different tabs

  • Breadcrumb trails for indications to starting point to the end point

  • Gives options and flexibility with code issues and code request

  • Filters for topics, authors, and language

  • Text heavy (e.g. words on each system when filtering, not enough whitespace)

  • Profile overview for authors

  • Messaging system between researchers

  • Had to go through each page one by one

  • Good and consistent design, made it easy to understand/navigate

  • Data display with profiles

  • Misconception that you have to be in that field to access the resources – make it accessible to everyone

  • Advanced search and filtering options

  • Location and job type filters are logically grouped

  • Collaboration features are effective

  • Engagement-based elements promote professional networking

FINAL DESIGN

We used an iterative process — researching, designing, testing, getting feedback, and rinse and repeat.

Filtering and searching for university resources.

Users are able to easily search and filter through their preferences — whether it be

department, collaboration type, and more — through a dropdown.

Accessing information.

The Collaborator Hub spreadsheet can be easily filtered, sorted, and accessed. Nested scrolling has been removed for clarity and usability.

LEARNINGS

I started in this organization as a general member — someone who was brand new to Figma — and had the opportunity to grow through both personal and client projects. Through my experience with this client project, I’ve not only grown my passion for equitable educational resources and technologies, but also learned to work with stakeholders, clients, and a variety of team members who bring individual, unique perspectives to the design process.


What drew me originally to UX was the research and learning that comes with it — listening to stories, choices, adversities, experiences. I want to strive on in my professional career and personal life with this passion in mind with each step I take.

made with ♡ by lia du

email

linkedin

github

made with ♡ by lia du